Yoda or Palpatine: The ideal teacher

in steemiteducation •  7 years ago 

Star Wars the Last Jedi was a blast! It would be really difficult to write without spoiling some part of the movie. As such, let us talk about the difference two great teachers in the Star Wars universe. Let us talk about who the ideal teacher is. Will it be Master Yoda or Emperor Palpatine


Image source

To be fair, let us not look at who is stronger or who was the good guy. Both of these Force wielders were teachers that trained really powerful Force wielders. Their students went on to be legends in their own right. Master Yoda trained many Jedi masters including Luke Skywalker. Whereas Emperor Palpatine trained Darth Vader. While both of them produced great students, their teaching methods are very different.

Problem solving

The skill of problem solving is one skill that has become the focus in many education systems. While many governments have their own unique way of creating a curriculum that teaches this skill, the most effective way to do it is debatable. In many ways Master Yoda and Emperor Palpatine both represent how education in the east and west approach problem solving.

Being exposed to a more western style of education, I have come to ses that method is more similar to Master Yoda's style of teaching. Problem solving is generally taught through guidance, in which the solution is never provided but discovered by the student. Master Yoda in this case does the same, imparting words of wisdom to help Luke Skywalker find the problem. However, he never tells Luke Skywalker the solution directly, leading him towards finding the right way to solve an issue.


Image source

Emperor Palpatine on the other hand tells or orders Darth Vader to accomplish a certain problem. Often times, Darth Vader is not allowed much freedom to discover the solution to a problem. As Emperor Palpatine nudges and pushes Darth Vader towards the solution of his choosing, this can leave him rather conflicted, especially at the end where he murdered his very own teacher.

Now, I am not saying which method is best, but one has to admit, Emperor Palpatine's teaching method is less time consuming. Guidance takes time, and if we teach our students like Master Yoda, it may not be feasible as a class may consist of 30 students. Imagine Master Yoda teaching 30 Luke Skywalkers, he probably jump in the swamp to end his misery. That being said, Master Yoda's way of teaching is more sustainable, creating students that are motivated, filled with wisdom and the right principles to solve any problem.

Aside from the manner in which they teach problem solving, one crucial characteristic of a teacher should be taken into account.

Tolerance towards failure

That one characteristic is patience or specifically, the teacher's tolerance towards failure. As seen in the scene where Master Yoda trained Luke Skywalker in the force, he was extremely patient, guiding him towards greatness. This of course is what we as teachers strive to do, slowly guiding our students towards learning certain difficult concepts. However, this is possible if the teacher is not confined by exams, a syllabus that needs completing and parents. As such, perhaps Emperor Palpatine's method is more feasible?


Image source

Emperor Palpatine does not tolerate failure, motivating his underlings towards accomplishing their tasks. This method is effective especially if the teacher's career is at stake, having to train the students to produce results at the end of the semester. In the long run, such a method is not effective, the system being too exam oriented may cause businesses to find ways of training students to pass exams only. Through this, students will seem to be achieving great results in exams. However, the skill of passing exams is not exactly an employable skill. Thus, unless the education system becomes less exam oriented, we should go on to the dark side with Emperor Palpatine's teaching methods.

Conclusion

The ideal teacher is at times dictated by different circumstances. This consist of how exam oriented the education system is, the demands of society and the demands of industry. Hopefully in the future, many of the teachers I know can be a Yoda to many students.

However, as long as culture and the nation places a huge focus on exam results, we can never ever be the Yoda to our students. Until then, we shall all enjoy the dark side.


follow_alvinauh.gif

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

This was an interesting comparison and shows off these two styles of teaching in a very memorable way. There is quite a controversy in my state (New Mexico) at the moment over teachers objecting to having to "teach to the test" ... as opposed to using what they feel is the best approach to their various subjects.

They argue (correctly IMO) that this turns students into little robots, spitting out the "correct" answer to pass the test, but with no idea as to the context of their answer and no real depth of education in the subject. It also stifles critical thinking and emphasizes way too much the authoritarian idea of succeeding-by-pleasing-the-political-power-structure.

And yet educational funding from the federal government depends on achievement / excellence in passing these ubiquitous standardized tests. I think it was an idea with good intentions that went terribly -- and predictably -- wrong. Bureaucracy being what it is, fixing this (should they ever find the courage to try) may turn into yet another (predictable) headache for all concerned.

I have no answers for this because clearly "teaching to the test" has its short-range benefits ... and its long-range liabilities. For now we're stuck with it -- and the students and educational system as a whole suffer. Your subject in this article highlights some of these same ideas from another perspective. I don't envy you the environment in which you struggle to find the answers to your own beliefs in "the best way to approach teaching" ... for the good of everyone.

John Bradshaw (I think) used to include in some of his speeches the observation that school and prison were the two most obvious places where "time served" mattered more than "progress achieved." This fact is only aggravated by the "you can't fail anyone" philosophy you wrote about several days ago. When people only "put in the time" ... and don't really learn, education as a fundamental and necessary experience fails completely in its mission. Thank you for bringing this matter forward again for consideration and discussion.

This post has been selected as The Best Post of the Day for December 15 from the @moonbot post promotion channel by the independent curation team of @enchantedspirit and @catweasel. You have received an upvote from each of us as a gesture to reward and encourage this kind of quality. Thank you for your contribution to Steemit and for submitting this excellent post to Moonbot Post Promotion. We look forward to seeing more. Have a lovely day.

Thank you, really appreciate being nominated for best post of the day. At the end of the day, I think being personal with them and modeling good behavior are the best ways to help them learn. The school's funding and the students depend on grades, but having some stories and guidance on the side does make the learning more humanistic

Fantastic wisdom derived from the characters. A fun way to compare teaching styles. I think another problem with the Palpatine/Vader style of teaching/leadership is that if you snuff out the student/employee who makes the mistake, not only do you not motivate that individual to improve... since they're quite deceased, but you squander all of the positive things they had done to reach that position or point of training. Further, while motivating the other students/employees, who now fear for their lives, I think it has been proven that fear based motivation is of limited use and produces cautious, potentially ineffective people who will always steer their plans for the easy success rather than taking risks for grand victories. Further, if we train people out of fear, we only hold their loyalty until they face something that is more immediately fearful. This is a problem with abusive leaders in the military who spend time threatening discipline in garrison, only to find that soldiers fear death and dismemberment on the battlefield more than they fear discipline. Suddenly, it becomes apparent that they have not been trained/schooled to be excellent at their tasks, but just to avoid the appearance of mistakes. Great Post!!!

That's true, I tried including a military perspective but thought I should just keep it to star wars. I do find the use of fear common amongst the older generation of teachers on my culture. I suppose it worked for them by these days, kids are different and that method doesn't work anymore. Thanks for stopping by

I'm glad you kept it Star Wars... it worked beautifully. I was simply trying to support it with references from my own life, and not just restate your excellent analysis using the Star Wars universe.

Great follow up to a great post.

Glad you enjoyed it. Thank you for not giving away too much.

The force is strong with you.

Yoda was a great teacher :) #theunmentionables

He is, I wonder who his teacher was though..

It is true that schools are no longer a source of knowledge,
Today every child can have access to information via the Internet.
The school should be taught how to learn

Looking forward to a Yoda movie! A Palpatine movie would be great too. Torn.

I wonder how many trilogies a Yoda movie would would be, since he was 1000 years old...

It has to be Yoda. He's the greatest.