TOP 200 effective Steemit curators who are actively support newcomers (with reputation below 55) for the last week (2019.07.22-2018.07.28)

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators of the last week.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will talk about those curators, who are actively support newcomers. All of us know that it's not easy to become visible while you are a minnow even if you have a good content. Therefore, I believe that curators who actively support newcomers deserve a separate consideration and respect.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published their posts for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

5290 authors with reputation below 55 published their posts during this week. And it's a 53% of all authors.

34006 accounts participated in curating the content of authors with reputation below 55. It's a 69% of all curators.

598696 votes were made for the content of authors with reputation below 55 during this week. It's a 18,5% of all votes.

4120,52 SBD - is the total author rewards the content of authors with reputation below 55 for this week. It's a 5% of all rewards.

---

TOP-200 effective curators for the last week (2019.07.22-2018.07.28)

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@actifit	1388	416	2	175,05	4,25	13,77
2	@dlike	1772	311	2	104,76	2,54	6,16
3	@steemitboard	2223	1570	1	13,94	0,34	4,14
4	@curie	143	112	9	135,59	3,29	2,87
5	@blocktrades	40	36	12	185,83	4,51	1,26
6	@tombstone	222	157	2	41,67	1,01	1,24
7	@arcange	880	478	3	10,4	0,25	0,94
8	@mariusfebruary	163	122	4	35,44	0,86	0,82
9	@esteemapp	202	109	3	39,13	0,95	0,81
10	@sniffnscurry	80	55	24	63,25	1,54	0,66
11	@wackou	205	154	5	18,91	0,46	0,55
12	@steemmonsters	67	32	10	86,06	2,09	0,52
13	@dtube	27	18	17	127,39	3,09	0,43
14	@cervantes	72	56	15	27,22	0,66	0,29
15	@accelerator	543	361	1	3,42	0,08	0,23
16	@steempress-io	70	35	4	32,74	0,79	0,22
17	@balte	139	72	24	14,68	0,36	0,2
18	@vact	143	112	9	8,16	0,2	0,17
19	@wherein	135	39	9	23,47	0,57	0,17
20	@dclick	29	27	100	30,42	0,74	0,16
21	@tasteem	33	24	7	33,45	0,81	0,15
22	@ntopaz	26	22	30	34,17	0,83	0,14
23	@hendrikdegrote	143	112	9	5,69	0,14	0,12
24	@team	169	137	10	4,61	0,11	0,12
25	@delegate.lafona	72	58	16	10,02	0,24	0,11
26	@map10k	459	309	1	1,9	0,05	0,11
27	@steeming-hot	2086	1297	1	0,41	0,01	0,1
28	@glitterfart	30	21	10	21,53	0,52	0,09
29	@stpeople	93	33	10	14,06	0,34	0,09
30	@laissez-faire	9486	4066	100	0,1	0	0,08
31	@nextcolony	34	22	49	16,42	0,4	0,07
32	@gogreenbuddy	120	61	44	5,83	0,14	0,07
33	@lasseehlers	119	56	45	5,39	0,13	0,06
34	@votovzla	30	25	88	12,63	0,31	0,06
35	@macoolette	174	129	6	1,89	0,05	0,05
36	@organduo	43	22	28	13,04	0,32	0,05
37	@utopian-io	6	6	25	40,91	0,99	0,05
38	@bluesniper	705	530	1	0,51	0,01	0,05
39	@twinner	31	29	17	9,84	0,24	0,05
40	@pgarcgo	72	56	15	4,85	0,12	0,05
41	@heiditravels	71	56	15	5,08	0,12	0,05
42	@team-cn	134	42	20	6,14	0,15	0,05
43	@cnstm	163	48	10	5,63	0,14	0,05
44	@trevonjb	124	31	5	8,42	0,2	0,05
45	@profquax	121	79	8	3,56	0,09	0,05
46	@roadofrich	56	16	9	17,23	0,42	0,05
47	@blewitt	253	170	2	1,15	0,03	0,04
48	@virus707	98	22	1	8,95	0,22	0,04
49	@taskmaster4450	288	171	3	1,37	0,03	0,04
50	@warofcraft	169	125	20	1,87	0,05	0,04
51	@foruni73	64	43	95	4,4	0,11	0,04
52	@gtg	11	11	37	19,38	0,47	0,04
53	@raphaelle	880	478	8	0,49	0,01	0,04
54	@good-karma	202	109	3	2,1	0,05	0,04
55	@mmmmkkkk311	50	21	16	9,25	0,22	0,04
56	@sargewhale	68	20	100	7,63	0,19	0,03
57	@followbtcnews	55	43	16	3,23	0,08	0,03
58	@broncnutz	18	17	25	10,6	0,26	0,03
59	@good.game	37	19	15	8,51	0,21	0,03
60	@cjsdns	12	8	96	16,75	0,41	0,03
61	@earncrypto	100	100	70	1,37	0,03	0,03
62	@helpie	65	43	14	4,14	0,1	0,03
63	@shaka	19	16	27	10,19	0,25	0,03
64	@share2steem	116	88	2	1,57	0,04	0,03
65	@ocd	16	12	43	12,85	0,31	0,03
66	@blueorgy	417	270	4	0,59	0,01	0,03
67	@cub1	66	45	46	3,02	0,07	0,03
68	@stayoutoftherz	93	66	13	2,28	0,06	0,03
69	@cleanplanet	52	11	51	12,4	0,3	0,03
70	@planter	23	19	31	7,9	0,19	0,03
71	@comidinhas	68	20	100	6,94	0,17	0,03
72	@joshman	177	139	1	0,76	0,02	0,02
73	@rodrigocassio	68	20	100	6,26	0,15	0,02
74	@streetstyle	22	13	67	6,11	0,15	0,02
75	@steevebot	7	6	100	14,14	0,34	0,02
76	@theycallmedan	7	7	14	13,13	0,32	0,02
77	@shaya6677	99	44	55	1,98	0,05	0,02
78	@trips.teem	11	7	66	13,19	0,32	0,02
79	@abrockman	141	49	10	1,69	0,04	0,02
80	@neophilosoph	56	45	26	2,77	0,07	0,02
81	@musicvoter	166	117	4	0,76	0,02	0,02
82	@mustard	14	11	91	9,79	0,24	0,02
83	@kevinwong	92	59	1	1,42	0,03	0,02
84	@eonwarped	67	45	10	2,38	0,06	0,02
85	@jgcastrillo19	70	54	15	1,76	0,04	0,02
86	@oracle-d	7	5	10	17,06	0,41	0,02
87	@imisstheoldkanye	1021	643	1	0,18	0	0,02
88	@canadian-coconut	15	9	14	10,55	0,26	0,02
89	@luxbet	45	32	27	3,81	0,09	0,02
90	@aicu	32	28	69	3,74	0,09	0,02
91	@nathanmars	8	8	80	12,34	0,3	0,02
92	@dpoll.curation	44	18	33	5,14	0,12	0,02
93	@smallearth	29	18	77	5,25	0,13	0,02
94	@rubia.michelle	68	20	100	6,26	0,15	0,02
95	@staticinstance	121	63	2	2,03	0,05	0,02
96	@grandpawhale	121	63	2	1,72	0,04	0,02
97	@silviomangum29	68	20	100	6,27	0,15	0,02
98	@jjy	29	20	55	5,6	0,14	0,02
99	@steemchurch	55	39	31	2,9	0,07	0,02
100	@definethedollar	78	64	21	1,52	0,04	0,02
101	@viagens	68	20	100	6,26	0,15	0,02
102	@evepontes	68	20	100	6,26	0,15	0,02
103	@paypalbis	68	20	100	6,27	0,15	0,02
104	@neoxian	22	16	21	7,26	0,18	0,02
105	@najoh	102	66	100	0,55	0,01	0,01
106	@bowess	39	19	69	1,5	0,04	0,01
107	@wherein-bit	108	36	23	1,54	0,04	0,01
108	@stereovote	145	13	57	2,24	0,05	0,01
109	@sc-v	43	33	29	1,51	0,04	0,01
110	@achim86	97	60	100	0,63	0,02	0,01
111	@kryptonia	39	10	32	2,85	0,07	0,01
112	@memestagram	70	19	51	2,81	0,07	0,01
113	@lesiopm	36	27	43	1,39	0,03	0,01
114	@zephalexia	70	33	25	2,37	0,06	0,01
115	@kenanqhd	118	30	6	1,26	0,03	0,01
116	@jarunik	15	5	100	11,24	0,27	0,01
117	@pouchon	117	31	6	1,3	0,03	0,01
118	@louis88	18	16	36	3,23	0,08	0,01
119	@actifit.rewards	13	11	95	3,29	0,08	0,01
120	@waleedtee	29	27	98	1,13	0,03	0,01
121	@dodoim	17	11	97	2,49	0,06	0,01
122	@zuerich	50	20	38	2,47	0,06	0,01
123	@roncoejr	117	30	6	2,27	0,06	0,01
124	@jaysermendez	87	62	100	0,63	0,02	0,01
125	@r351574nc3	113	75	100	0,46	0,01	0,01
126	@novacadian	33	31	95	1,92	0,05	0,01
127	@redpalestino	15	14	12	3,69	0,09	0,01
128	@majes	25	18	45	1,73	0,04	0,01
129	@acidyo	5	4	53	14,09	0,34	0,01
130	@delabo	62	51	15	0,73	0,02	0,01
131	@chriddi	41	23	50	2,77	0,07	0,01
132	@mcoinz79	128	38	9	1,5	0,04	0,01
133	@lagtv	117	30	6	0,9	0,02	0,01
134	@msp-curation	10	10	88	5,79	0,14	0,01
135	@glastar	165	47	4	0,88	0,02	0,01
136	@edprivat	147	108	3	0,6	0,01	0,01
137	@leo.voter	15	13	25	4,96	0,12	0,01
138	@lagtvgames	121	34	6	0,95	0,02	0,01
139	@truce	116	30	6	2,38	0,06	0,01
140	@ketcom	103	31	6	0,87	0,02	0,01
141	@kadna	45	35	18	1,12	0,03	0,01
142	@ausbitbank	20	17	22	2,8	0,07	0,01
143	@thebluewin	72	39	34	1,4	0,03	0,01
144	@ano123	118	30	6	2,18	0,05	0,01
145	@r2cornell	32	12	23	3,3	0,08	0,01
146	@wafrica	52	15	19	1,97	0,05	0,01
147	@midlet	120	32	7	1,1	0,03	0,01
148	@hedge-x	23	13	100	2,64	0,06	0,01
149	@stevethevagabond	38	25	61	1,42	0,03	0,01
150	@primeradue	136	118	16	0,55	0,01	0,01
151	@zahidzzs	96	61	99	0,69	0,02	0,01
152	@alfatron777	148	99	28	0,28	0,01	0,01
153	@blockops	12	10	90	4,43	0,11	0,01
154	@theestateof.mind	118	31	7	1,38	0,03	0,01
155	@felt.buzz	283	210	3	0,15	0	0,01
156	@supremebape	117	29	6	1,37	0,03	0,01
157	@daltono	85	35	15	1,96	0,05	0,01
158	@topcryptonews	119	29	11	1,91	0,05	0,01
159	@cheneats	234	179	34	0,3	0,01	0,01
160	@gascap9000	100	29	7	2,24	0,05	0,01
161	@haccolong	59	59	97	0,59	0,01	0,01
162	@hoaithu	59	59	97	0,57	0,01	0,01
163	@vimm	33	14	18	1,98	0,05	0,01
164	@mindtrap	119	31	6	1,34	0,03	0,01
165	@lanhange	10	10	100	3,24	0,08	0,01
166	@onepercentbetter	118	30	6	0,9	0,02	0,01
167	@stablewon	5	5	100	11,77	0,29	0,01
168	@world-travel-pro	104	30	6	0,89	0,02	0,01
169	@hhusaini	49	16	89	4,07	0,1	0,01
170	@steem-bootcamp	54	39	38	1,61	0,04	0,01
171	@airbud23	14	13	79	4,6	0,11	0,01
172	@ippua	28	20	100	3,44	0,08	0,01
173	@improv	207	100	6	0,28	0,01	0,01
174	@marfonso	124	32	6	0,95	0,02	0,01
175	@buttcoins	150	117	4	0,42	0,01	0,01
176	@canna-curate	40	22	27	2,09	0,05	0,01
177	@ddong	7	7	100	4,17	0,1	0,01
178	@kr-newbie	47	19	81	2,3	0,06	0,01
179	@uche-nna	81	56	99	0,8	0,02	0,01
180	@atomy.indonesia	52	16	78	2,51	0,06	0,01
181	@clumsysilverdad	34	33	51	1,2	0,03	0,01
182	@justyy	84	22	5	3,41	0,08	0,01
183	@nineteensixteen	60	35	12	1,19	0,03	0,01
184	@actifit.funds	63	62	40	0,63	0,02	0,01
185	@actifit.pay	63	62	40	0,63	0,02	0,01
186	@sebescen81	78	25	19	2,3	0,06	0,01
187	@jiujitsu	151	115	10	0,61	0,01	0,01
188	@steemhunt	15	5	3	8,24	0,2	0,01
189	@nothus	72	49	98	0,95	0,02	0,01
190	@movingman	196	146	7	0,31	0,01	0,01
191	@vortac	19	9	25	7,3	0,18	0,01
192	@rodrook	62	60	60	0,65	0,02	0,01
193	@v4vapid	5	3	44	10,03	0,24	0,01
194	@tonalddrump	41	30	30	0,89	0,02	0,01
195	@juliakponsford	87	65	18	0,58	0,01	0,01
196	@mhm-philippines	100	89	17	0,72	0,02	0,01
197	@eric-boucher	144	116	5	0,62	0,02	0,01
198	@jackramsey	81	68	22	0,46	0,01	0,01
199	@crimsonclad	54	42	14	1,33	0,03	0,01
200	@patti.pizza	54	39	38	0,92	0,02	0,01

---

I took all vote bots (most of them are working like pay for vote) in the separate table. Because we can't call them effective curators. Their work depends on authors payments and activity.
If you know another bots in the list above please tell me about it.

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@jerrybanfield	724	216	100	107,01	2,6	4,37
2	@partiko	1236	825	1	22,94	0,56	3,58
3	@tipu	107	63	4	85,97	2,09	1,02
4	@booster	42	18	17	193,21	4,69	0,66
5	@therising	22	16	19	180,54	4,38	0,55
6	@appreciator	17	16	25	119,66	2,9	0,36
7	@partiko-promoter	436	234	12	8,02	0,19	0,35
8	@smartsteem	16	16	14	92,64	2,25	0,28
9	@upmewhale	18	14	13	90,14	2,19	0,24
10	@rocky1	11	10	17	39,35	0,95	0,07
11	@steem-plus	626	166	1	1,75	0,04	0,05
12	@smartmarket	62	43	4	6,56	0,16	0,05
13	@promobot	15	6	60	45,28	1,1	0,05
14	@steembasicincome	38	21	79	9,38	0,23	0,04
15	@sbi5	92	67	49	2,85	0,07	0,04
16	@sbi3	68	54	40	4,03	0,1	0,04
17	@sbi2	44	31	60	5,4	0,13	0,03
18	@sbi4	69	51	43	3,1	0,08	0,03
19	@minnowsupport	25	12	22	15,33	0,37	0,03
20	@sbi6	82	56	52	2,14	0,05	0,02
21	@sbi8	85	68	62	1,33	0,03	0,02
22	@boomerang	14	8	14	15,86	0,38	0,02
23	@sbi7	83	66	57	1,83	0,04	0,02
24	@inciter	11	9	13	4,14	0,1	0,01
25	@sbi9	64	50	73	0,95	0,02	0,01
26	@onlyprofitbot	18	10	49	3,13	0,08	0,01
27	@steem-ua	35	20	2	1,65	0,04	0,01
28	@sbi10	71	63	92	0,72	0,02	0,01
29	@buildawhale	7	6	10	12,48	0,3	0,01
30	@busy.pay	66	19	1	3,33	0,08	0,01
31	@upmyvote	10	9	11	6,21	0,15	0,01

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit. These people keep the majority of the newcomers on the platform and give them hope.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.

---

_{Sponsored ( Powered by dclick )}