How to better accept criticism?

Humans make mistakes. Everyone does them, and we may better by learning from them. To get there, we must know our mistakes. But it's complicated: some don't realise their mistakes, while others do.

Reviews aid us. Critics tell us what they don't like about us. Of course, this enhancement idea may not work. Even if the individual is right, we may not want to change and take it harshly.

Critique hurts us, right? We typically view them as evil things said to hurt us. However, they are ways to improve and allow others to tell us what we did wrong.

It's crucial to know how to respond to criticism without hurting people. Thus, we shall take every opportunity to avoid relationship conflicts.

We don't know how to respond when told to improve. As no one is perfect, this may happen multiple times in our life. First, we must decide if criticism interests us. We must decide if we wish to improve this element of our lives. If so, you must comprehend their intent. Asking inquiries to determine if the critique is based on solid and objective observations can restrict it:

These questions will help us distinguish between reality-based comments and others. This will help us distinguish constructive from damaging criticism. How do we respond to this first sort of criticism when we know what's being said?

Some criticism is valid, but we never know how to respond. Let's start by accepting them without justifying ourselves. After that, we can select whether to change the trait we were taught about. We can accomplish it if we wish.

If we wish to improve something, we can tell the other person. A simple “you're right, I'll pay attention to this subject” works. If our interlocutor keeps bringing up this issue, we can utilise the broken record technique to repeat this sentence without additional discussion.

Change might be challenging, so we need time and psychological aid. We can tell our conversation partner that “change is complicated”. We can also request assistance or suggest alternatives. This will make our counterpart more compassionate. Being defensive will only raise tension between the parties.

Finally, refusing to adjust can be criticised. Our best option is to agree with our counterpart. to calm down We can also provide ideas to improve the issue and negotiate to avoid conflict.

We sometimes hear unfounded criticisms. To avoid pointless arguments, control the situation wisely. Fog bank and uncertain alternate assertiveness strategies can help.

In the fog bank, we quote the other to indicate that we understand their intentions without losing our viewpoint. Example: “It’s normal for you to feel this way if you think I’m not responding to your messages because you’re not important to me.” Thus, we paraphrase and comprehend without losing our perspective. Next, we can say "I will think about it" or "I will take it into account, I will be careful". Thus, we partially agree with our counterpart.

Reacting gently and empathetically to a suggestion for improvement will greatly reduce the likelihood of conflict with the other party and increase your chances of maintaining a comfortable relationship thanks to this form of compromise.

---